Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tids topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves creation of Tax Increment District No. 17 amid questions about 'but-for' findings and PAYGO safeguards
Summary
The West Bend Common Council voted 6–1 on Jan. 20, 2025, to create TID No. 17, approve its project plan and establish boundaries. Councilors debated the legal and fiscal safeguards — including PAYGO protections and minimum value guarantees in forthcoming developer agreements — before passage.
The City of West Bend’s common council voted 6–1 to create Tax Increment District No. 17, approving its project plan and establishing the district boundaries at its Jan. 20 meeting. Council discussion focused on whether the district met the statutory "but-for" test and how the city would safeguard taxpayers if development revenues do not meet projections.
Why it matters: a TID diverts future property tax increments from taxing jurisdictions to pay for eligible project costs within the district’s boundaries. The district approved Jan. 20 is intended to incentivize mixed-use development in parts of the city where developers have cited infrastructure costs as a barrier to new residential construction.
Council debate and safeguards discussed:
Councilors and staff described multiple TID classifications under Wisconsin law, noting that mixed-use TIDs are an authorized form of incentive distinct from environmental or blight TIDs. City staff and administration said the proposed TID follows the mixed-use provisions in state law and that past problematic TIDs had informed a more cautious approach.
City staff emphasized PAYGO (pay-as-you-go) structures in developer agreements that limit city outlays until tax increment revenues materialize. Staff also said developer agreements under negotiation will include minimum value guarantees intended to ensure a project’s taxable value is sufficient to cover proposed TID obligations. Administration said the "but-for" determination — that the development would not occur but for the TID incentive — applies at multiple stages, including creation of the TID and each subsequent developer agreement.
Aldermen pressed for clarity on long-term taxpayer exposure if projects underperform. Staff responded that recent TIDs created in the last decade had avoided the most problematic structures by requiring PAYGO and specific thresholds in agreements.
Outcome and next steps: the council approved the TID 6–1; the measure will be presented to the Joint Review Board the following day. Staff will continue negotiating developer agreements that include minimum value guarantees and PAYGO mechanisms. Documentation will be submitted to the Joint Review Board as required by state law.
