Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hb159 Rids topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears bill to allow rural improvement districts to fund maintenance, not just improvements
Summary
Representative Alana Griffith told the House Local Government Committee that House Bill 159 would let counties form rural improvement districts to pay for maintenance of existing public facilities, not only for capital improvements.
Representative Alana Griffith (R–House District 60) presented House Bill 159 to the House Local Government Committee, saying the bill would allow rural improvement districts to fund routine maintenance of existing public facilities, not only capital improvements. "Essentially, right now the only type of rural improvement district we can have is an improvement district which means that in order to establish a rural improvement district you have to have some sort of improvement," Griffith told the committee.
Why it matters: supporters said the change would let counties address roads and other facilities that are already in public use but that were not eligible for an improvement RID under the current statutory framework. Griffith cited several counties where commissioners have faced challenges bringing existing subdivision infrastructure into RID processes and said the bill is meant to address immediate maintenance needs in places such as Broadwater, Gallatin, Flathead, Madison, Lake and Meagher counties.
What the bill would do: Griffith said HB159 adds maintenance as an allowable purpose and clarifies that, in some cases, the board of county commissioners may order and create a district without a separate petition when property owners previously waived the petition process during subdivision approval; those waivers are placed on the plat and filed with the clerk and recorder, she said.
Proponents: Gordon Oelkers, first vice president of the Montana Association of Counties and Roosevelt County commissioner, urged support and said the measure "clears up the process for creating the rural improvement districts and tells the county how to budget for these improvements and how to request funding for the maintenance of the improvements." He noted that current statutory language (as cited in testimony: 7122102) does not include the word "maintenance," which has led counties to treat maintenance and improvement differently in votes and levies.
Committee questions: members asked about how waivers work in practice, how voters within a proposed district are notified, and whether existing subdivisions without a waiver on the plat could use a waiver retroactively. Griffith and county representatives said the waiver mechanism is recorded as part of the subdivision plat and that subdivisions created before such waivers would continue to rely on a vote rather than a waiver process. Representative Elvrom asked for clarification about whether roads would be public or private; Karen Alley, associate general counsel for the Montana Association of Counties, said it depends on the dedication language on the plat and the petition language for the RID.
Outcome and next steps: the committee held a public hearing; no committee vote was taken on HB159 during the session recorded in the transcript. Griffith asked for a "do pass" recommendation.
Ending: The hearing closed after committee questions and proponents' testimony; committee members indicated further review with county attorneys and stakeholders could follow.
