Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workforce Rvts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee moves to repeal alternate out-of-state RVT registration pathway; staff told to tighten education equivalency rules
Summary
After two stakeholder meetings and extensive comment, the MDC voted to repeal CCR Section 2068.6 (the out‑of‑state registration equivalency pathway) and directed staff to review the remaining alternate-route regulation (CCR 2068.5) to ensure education and instructor standards protect consumers while addressing workforce concerns.
The Medical Director Committee voted to recommend repealing California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 16, Section 2068.6, the regulation that treats an out‑of‑state RVT registration as equivalent for California registration when certain experience and checklist criteria are met.
Why: The subcommittee convened two stakeholder meetings, reviewed nearly 200 written comments and heard from technicians who had used the out‑of‑state pathway. Although attendees generally acknowledged the value of practical experience, the unanimous message from stakeholders was that formal education provides essential knowledge — "the why" behind clinical tasks — needed for patient safety and client communication. Several technicians reported returning to school after obtaining an out‑of‑state registration because they lacked that foundation.
Committee direction: The MDC approved repealing CCR § 2068.6 and directed the RVT subcommittee to evaluate CCR § 2068.5 (the education-plus-directed-clinical-practice equivalency) to consider whether the number of experience hours, the definition of a qualified instructor and the provider-review criteria should be updated to reduce ambiguity and strengthen consumer protection while avoiding unnecessary workforce barriers.
Outcome: The motion to repeal CCR § 2068.6 carried on recorded vote; staff will prepare the regulatory package and assess possible adjustments to the remaining alternate-route regulation.
Next steps: Staff and the subcommittee will seek a tighter definition of "qualified instructor," consider reducing audit burden associated with anecdotal ad‑hoc education claims, and examine flexibility measures for trainees completing coursework while employed.
