Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Continuing Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board committee backs overhaul of continuing-education rules, adds new CE credit for pro bono spay/neuter and exam work
Summary
The Veterinary Medical Board's Medical Director Committee on Jan. 15 voted to recommend a legislative package that would consolidate continuing-education law into a new BPC article and add specific CE credit for pro bono spay/neuter and for expert participation in exam workshops.
The Veterinary Medical Board's Medical Director Committee on Jan. 15 voted to recommend a legislative package that would repeal two existing CE statutes and add a single article (new BPC article 3.1) consolidating continuing-education requirements for veterinarians and registered veterinary technicians (RVTs).
The proposal would: repeal Business and Professions Code (BPC) sections the committee identified as duplicative; create new BPC sections 4858, 4858.1, 4858.2 and 4858.3 to replace them; allow RVTs to earn up to 2 CE hours for performing pro bono spay/neuter services under a qualified program; and allow RVTs to earn up to 16 hours for participating as subject-matter experts in examination-preparation workshops tied to national licensing exams. The committee also moved language clarifying which providers and sponsors qualify to offer CE and added explicit language allowing “licensee mental health and wellness and its impact on the delivery of veterinary services” to count under existing practice-management/wellness limits.
Why it matters: Committee members said the restructuring reduces duplication across statutes and regulations and makes eligibility clearer for nontraditional CE such as pro bono clinic work and wellness training. The committee debated how many CE hours may be earned for business/practice-management and wellness courses (currently up to 24 of 36 CE hours for veterinarians) and left that limit unchanged after stakeholder comment. Members also directed staff to tidy cross‑references and to prepare rulemaking if the legislative changes are enacted.
Stakeholders and staff: The committee discussed the proposal with representatives from the California Veterinary Medical Association and other stakeholder groups. Grant Miller, regulatory director at CVMA, told the committee he supported allowing some pro bono credit and noted shelters’ operational realities; CVMA also asked for clear wording tying supervision and proof-of-completion to the supervising veterinarian. Several board members pressed for precise provider and audit language so wellness and practice-management credit cannot be claimed for unrelated courses (for example, general yoga classes).
Outcome: The MDC voted to recommend submission of the amended legislative proposal to the Board for inclusion in the Board’s 2025 sunset review package. The motion passed on a roll-call vote with all members voting yes.
Next steps: If the Legislature adopts the proposal, staff said it would prepare a conforming CCR (Title 16) rule‑making package to repeal or amend affected regulations.
Ending note: Committee members asked staff to return to the MDC if statutory language requires follow‑up rulemaking to clarify how service-based CE (pro bono clinic hours) will be documented and audited.
