Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facility Naming topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board asks policy committee to review naming-rights and advertising rules for stadium and gym

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members discussed facility naming and advertising opportunities for the new turf field and asked the policy committee to review current district policies and practices for naming rights, sponsorships and advertising.

The Garfield Heights board discussed whether to pursue naming-rights or sponsorship agreements for district athletic facilities and asked the policy committee to review existing policies on commemoration and advertising.

Board members raised options including naming stadiums, fields, gyms, floors or locker rooms and discussed the revenue and stewardship implications of soliciting corporate or donor support. Staff described historical examples in which donors funded facility enhancements and were granted naming recognition; the district’s current most active commercial relationship was described as a Coca-Cola contract that included signage and periodic funding. Staff recommended that the policy committee examine other districts’ approaches, the length and terms of naming agreements, whether donations must be paid up front or can be accepted over time, and how donated funds would be designated and maintained.

The board agreed to send the matter to the policy committee for review and return recommendations, with Tandeka and Ashley Thomas named to the policy committee. No final naming decisions were made at this meeting.