Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pretrial Release topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Travis County judge sets bonds, explains rights in arraignment docket

2128033 · January 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Judge Pam Sigman reviewed constitutional rights, bond options and set bail or personal-bond eligibility for eight defendants on a multi-defendant arraignment docket. Several charges originated in other counties and some defendants qualified for personal bonds with conditions such as alcohol evaluations or pretrial supervision.

Judge Pam Sigman opened a Travis County arraignment session by advising defendants of their rights, bond options and the range of punishment for the charges they face, then reviewed and set bond conditions for multiple individuals.

Sigman told each person, “You have the right to remain silent,” and described three ways to be released from custody: cash bond, surety bond or a personal bond. She repeatedly advised defendants to consult counsel about options including requesting an examining trial for felony matters and to speak with their court-appointed attorney if one has been assigned.

The judge announced bond amounts and conditions for eight defendants. Reyes Flores was told he faces a class A misdemeanor charge of tampering with a government document and that a Williamson County judge set his bail at $2,000 cash or surety; a personal bond was not authorized by the Williamson County judge. Horacio Perez, charged with a class B misdemeanor driving-while-intoxicated, was told his bail was set at $3,000 and that he qualified for a personal bond with the condition of participating in an alcohol evaluation. Lara Gordon faces a state-jail felony possession (penalty group 1) from Hays County; that county’s judge set bond at $15,000 cash or surety.

Antonio Navarete was told Williamson County set his DWI bond at $2,500 cash or surety and that a personal bond was not being offered. A defendant identified as Jaime (recorded in the transcript as Raybelle/Jaime) was informed he faces a third-degree felony deadly-conduct charge for discharging a firearm; bond was set at $8,000 with conditions of pretrial-supervision and a prohibition on firearm possession. Pretrial services was asked to interview the defendant about personal-bond eligibility and to report back.

James Wilson and Jessica Perez both qualified for personal bonds and were told they could be released without posting money. Wilson’s charge is a class B DWI with bail set at $3,000. Jessica Perez faces two state-jail felonies—credit or debit card abuse and possession of a controlled substance—with combined bond set at $8,000 (separate $5,000 and $3,000 amounts) and personal-bond eligibility. James Truett faces two charges: a third-degree felony for possession of a controlled substance (more than 1 gram but less than 4 grams) with bond set at $5,000 and a class A misdemeanor unlawful carrying of a weapon with bond set at $3,000 (combined $8,000). Truett qualified for a personal bond with conditions including a felony drug evaluation and drug-court screening.

On jurisdiction, Sigman made clear that several cases originated in other counties and that those counties’ judges or officials retain certain authorities. For example, she said Williamson County judges had set bonds and that Williamson County had up to 10 working days to transport defendants if they were not released from Travis County custody. She also told defendants that if they could not post bond in Travis County they could consult their lawyers about seeking reductions or personal bonds.

Throughout the docket the judge reminded defendants that failing to appear could result in arrest warrants, that appointed counsel should contact them, and that release timing from the jail could be several hours depending on processing.

No formal votes or legislative actions occurred; the session consisted of judicial advisals and bond settings for pending criminal cases.