Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Geologic Survey Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Idaho Geologic Survey seeks permanent database manager amid grant funding uncertainty
Summary
The Idaho Geologic Survey asked the Joint Finance Committee to fund a database manager position that had been supported by expiring grants; the director warned losing the role would harm the agency’s data preservation and matching capacity.
Kevin Campbell of the Legislative Services Office presented the Idaho Geologic Survey (IGS) budget and said IGS is the state’s lead agency for collecting and disseminating geologic and mineral data. Campbell said IGS had 12.47 authorized FTP and on the sampling date had several vacancies.
IGS Director Claudio Berti told the committee the database manager position has been historically grant funded and that grant funding is running out. “The work that this position does is fundamental to our agency,” Berti said. He warned that if the position lost support the survey’s operations would be in a “very precarious situation” and described the role as one that helps the agency leverage federal grants (he said the position produces a two‑to‑one match on federal money).
Berti described IGS activities including geologic mapping, mineral‑resource assessment, core/data preservation and a seismic monitoring item purchased in recent years (a seismometer for the Idaho Seismic Network). He said IGS provides non‑proprietary data publicly and sometimes works in concert with exploration companies, but that all data managed by the survey become part of the public record.
Committee members asked whether IGS partners with others on economic impact analysis. Berti said IGS does not have bandwidth to perform detailed economic impact studies in‑house but is working to establish partnerships with other university centers for economic analysis. Representative Price asked whether the position’s prior grant funding might be renewed; Berti said grant support had come from abandoned‑mine funds and Department of Lands programs but the survey cannot guarantee future grant availability and requested permanent general‑fund support to secure the position.
Berti also described a desire to expand the survey’s data preservation work to include physical core repositories and preservation of physical samples, saying such a repository would provide lasting value to the state and to companies that invest in exploration. He offered to provide the committee with cost and site information for a repository and cited models from other states.
The committee did not act on the request at the hearing; members noted the position’s partial funding history (0.19 FTE in FY 2025 and a further 0.13 FTE request for FY 2026) and suggested packaging or policy changes to avoid repeatedly funding fractional FTE increments.
