Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves $184,000 piggyback contract for middle-school surveillance and signs letter supporting San Jose grant
Summary
The board approved a packaged security-surveillance contract for middle schools and signed a letter supporting San Jose’s active-transportation grant; trustees also approved the consent calendar.
The Board of Trustees voted to approve district contracts for exterior security cameras at middle schools, authorized a letter of support for the City of San Jose’s sustainable transportation grant application, and approved the meeting’s consent calendar.
Security contract: District staff presented action authorizing roughly $184,000 for a packaged security and surveillance system for all middle schools. Staff said technology had recommended piggybacking on an existing Merced contract so the district could move without issuing a new RFP. Staff explained cameras will be exterior only, used to review recorded footage after incidents (not for continuous live monitoring), and that signs will be posted consistent with board policy.
Trustees asked about operating times and who would have access. Staff said the system is web‑based, that footage would be reviewed after the fact rather than monitored live, and that access would be limited to appropriate technology staff and others as defined in district procedures. Trustees noted the equipment coverage was determined after a site assessment.
A trustee moved to approve the surveillance package; another trustee seconded, and the motion passed. The transcript records the outcome as “All in favor? Aye. She carries.” The motion materials referenced a $184,000 contract and a piggyback on the Merced contract.
Letter of support: Trustees discussed an emailed request for a letter of support for the City of San Jose’s sustainable/active transportation planning grant submission. A trustee moved to approve a letter of support for San Jose’s active-transportation program application and the board voted to approve it. Board members said formal approval of the letter was not strictly required but placed the approval on the record.
Consent calendar: Trustees moved and seconded approval of the consent items in aggregate; the board voted to approve the consent items. Trustees briefly noted a departing committee member on an item list and confirmed future meeting dates for the district facilities committee.
No roll-call vote-by-name was recorded in the transcript for these items; the minutes record that motions passed with an "Aye" from members in attendance.
