Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City attorneys brief council on Open and Public Meetings Act, conflict disclosure changes and harassment policy
Summary
City legal staff gave training on the Open and Public Meetings Act, closed-meeting rules, conflict-of-interest disclosure changes required by new state law, and the city's harassment policy; councilors were told the state now requires online posting of detailed disclosures and staff will implement a local process.
City legal staff provided a training session covering the Open and Public Meetings Act, municipal ethics disclosure requirements under the Municipal Officers and Employees Act, and the city's workplace harassment policy.
The attorney reviewing the statute told the council that a "meeting" includes convenings where a quorum discusses or acts on matters under the body's jurisdiction and that closed meetings must start as open meetings and may be used only for specific reasons enumerated in state law (personnel character and competence, security matters, pending litigation, acquisition or sale of property, etc.). The attorney emphasized that closed meetings cannot be used to take final action and that minutes and recordings are required except in narrow circumstances involving private health matters.
On ethics and financial disclosure, staff explained recent state legislative changes require more detailed disclosures. The new statewide form (from the state auditor's office) asks for employers, prior-year income sources of $5,000 or more, ownership interests, and stock holdings valued above $5,000; it must be posted online within two days of filing and remain posted while the official is in office. Staff told the council they will prepare a local upload process and will not retroactively require filings for prior terms; they will provide the new form for council review when available.
The presentation also reviewed the city's harassment-prevention policy, expectations for reporting and investigation, non-retaliation protections, and the city's process for handling complaints. Legal staff reiterated that council members who receive a harassment report must notify the city manager and legal counsel promptly.
Councilors asked clarifying questions about closed-meeting procedure, how to treat "unfinished business" and liaison reporting responsibilities. Staff said they will furnish written guidance and updated forms where required.
