Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Council hears staff recommendation to separate tattooing from permanent cosmetics in zoning code
Summary
City staff recommended defining tattooing and permanent cosmetics as separate land uses and updating zoning tables; the planning commission had recommended combining them, and councilors asked staff to return with clarified language and potentially send major changes back to planning commission for public hearing.
City staff presented a proposed municipal code amendment to separate "tattooing" and "permanent cosmetics" (permanent makeup, microblading and related services) into distinct land-use definitions and to update the land-use table accordingly.
Senior planning staff said tattoo shops and permanent-cosmetic businesses have different business models and market areas: tattooing is typically appointment-driven and regional in draw, so staff recommended locating tattooing in the CH (commercial highway) zone; permanent cosmetics and similar beauty services often operate as neighborhood…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
