Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the High School Schedule topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and band boosters press board to revisit high‑school schedule and block scheduling
Summary
Multiple speakers, including parents and the Council Rock North band parent president, urged the board and education committee to re-examine high‑school scheduling (including block scheduling) to expand student course options and reduce conflicts with extracurriculars.
Several parents and community members used public comment to urge the board to re-open study of a high‑school schedule change, including options such as block scheduling or a later start time.
Parents said the current schedule limits students’ ability to take multiple electives or advanced courses without sacrificing participation in extracurricular activities. "For kids like that, having the block scheduling...is compelling because it allows my daughter...to take music theory without having to drop a period," one parent said during the agenda-item public-comment period, urging the board to "research, go through the data" and build on work done in 2018–19.
Craig Myers, president of the Council Rock North Band Parents Association, told the board that many students who wish to pursue sequential academic pathways (for example, four years of math and science or advanced computer-science tracks) find scheduling constraints force them to take community-college classes or forgo school electives. "It behooves the question of how many students are really limited in their choices," he said.
Trustees and committee chairs confirmed the high‑school schedule has not changed in more than 40 years and said the Education Committee will explore options deliberately. Education Committee Chair Khan told trustees the topic was last explored in 2018–19 by a stakeholder committee and that any further work would be "intentional and purposeful," modeled on the full‑day kindergarten planning process.
No formal vote occurred; board members said the matter will continue in committee work and future education‑committee meetings.
