Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mailbox Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County outlines mailbox-replacement policy: $80 check option, county replacement, and disqualification for severely deteriorated boxes
Summary
Washington County reviewed a mailbox policy adopted by a prior committee: owners may take an $80 check or have the county replace a damaged mailbox; county will not pay if the mailbox was already in very poor condition. The county does not currently equip plow trucks with cameras.
Get email alerts on the Mailbox Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Washington County staff updated the committee on the county's mailbox-damage policy, which the prior committee requested staff report on after a full winter season.
Under the current policy, when a county plow damages a mailbox the county will either pay the homeowner a check for $80 or replace the mailbox and post. If the owner prefers a different-style mailbox, staff said the owner may accept the $80 check and arrange a replacement independently; county crews typically install a standard black mailbox on a standard post if the county performs the replacement.
Staff said the policy was changed from a previous approach that required homeowners to prove plow-caused damage. Historically, if damage appeared caused by snow being pushed, the county would not pay; if a plow hit the box, the county paid. The updated policy avoids lengthy disputes by offering the $80 check or county replacement except in cases where a mailbox is already in such poor condition that it would have failed on its own. In those cases the county will not pay for replacement.
The committee asked whether the county equips plow trucks with forward-facing cameras to document incidents; staff replied the county does not have cameras on plow trucks at this time and noted poor lighting and heavy snow can make camera footage of winter incidents unreliable.
Staff said the policy has helped field staff handle calls more efficiently and that no policy change was requested at this meeting; the department provided a chart summarizing how many homeowners chose a check, county replacement, or were denied because of preexisting poor condition.

