Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics And Conflicts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mesquite council receives annual ethics refresher covering conflicts, disclosures and recusal rules
Summary
City staff delivered a mandatory ethics refresher to the Mesquite City Council that reviewed relevant state statutes, city charter and municipal ordinances and clarified disclosure and recusal procedures; councilmembers asked questions about political contributions and other hypotheticals.
Tony Cowen, the city’s director of Housing and Community Services, delivered the Mesquite City Council’s annual ethics training on Jan. 6, reviewing state and local rules on conflicts of interest, financial disclosures, gifts and penalties for violations.
The training matters because the city receives federal and state grant funds that make annual ethics training a requirement; Cowen said, “your annual ethics training is required and mandated by the Texas Department of Transportation due to the fact that we receive grant funds from them in our various business dealings.” The presentation summarized where elected officials should look for rules and guidance, including the Mesquite Charter, the Mesquite Code of Ordinances and state statutes governing financial disclosure, business interests and gifts.
Cowen walked the council through key local provisions, including Article 4, Section 34 of the Mesquite Charter, which he read in part about financial interests in city contracts and the consequence of malfeasance, and the City Code sections that lay out definitions, standards of conduct and penalties. He told the council that the code requires elected and appointed officials to disclose personal or private interests in matters before a board and to refrain from participating in discussion or voting; he quoted the Texas law on recusals: “You should not even participate in the discussion of the item. The best practice is to excuse yourself from the meeting while the item is being deliberated, discussed, or and voted on.”
Cowen also reviewed the city’s policy on gifts and outside activities, including the requirement to file an affidavit with the city secretary when a potential conflict exists, and noted that failure to comply can lead to expulsion, reprimand or removal from office under local rules as well as potential state penalties.
During a brief question-and-answer period, Mayor Pro Tem Jeff Casper asked about political contributions from developers and whether contributions could later require a recusal; an official identified in the training as the city attorney advised that a contribution may be prohibited if it exceeds statutory limits or if it is made when a development matter is pending or expected before the council. Cowen and the city attorney emphasized that context and timing determine whether a contribution is prohibited and recommended that officials consult the city attorney and city secretary when they have concerns.
Cowen closed by reminding councilmembers that the city’s Council Policies and Procedures and the Mesquite General Government Policies and Procedures manual provide additional guidance—and that the city attorney’s office is available for case-by-case advice. The council did not take any formal action on policy changes during the meeting.
The training presentation and a printed chapter of the council policies were provided to members at the meeting.
