Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Vermont Brigham decision requires state to ensure substantially equal educational opportunity, Ways & Means counsel tells committee
Summary
John Grama, of the Office of Legislative Counsel, told the House Ways & Means Committee on Jan. 16 that the Vermont Supreme Court's Brigham decision requires the state to ensure "substantial equality of educational opportunity" because a funding system that depends heavily on local property taxes produces constitutionally impermissible disparities.
John Grama, of the Office of Legislative Counsel, told the House Ways & Means Committee on Jan. 16 that the Vermont Supreme Court's Brigham decision requires the state to ensure "substantial equality of educational opportunity" across school districts, because a system that relies heavily on local property taxes produces wide disparities in revenues available to districts.
The court, Grama said, found that the Act 84 foundation plan in place since the late 1980s set a single foundation tax rate and a separate foundation cost; where the single rate left property-poor districts short of the foundation cost, the state provided aid to make up the difference. But the record showed wealthier districts could (and did) raise revenues above the foundation amount, producing large spending disparities that the state conceded deny students in property-poor districts "the same educational opportunities" available elsewhere.
That is the significance of Brigham, Grama told the committee: the Vermont Constitution recognizes a right to education and a…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

