Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ways and Means committee debriefs proposed foundation formula, flags equity and data concerns
Summary
Members of the Ways and Means committee discussed a proposed school funding "foundation formula," raising questions about how money would be distributed to districts, guardrails to preserve funding, unequal local capacity to raise revenue, and data accuracy from the Agency of Education.
Members of the Ways and Means committee spent a debriefing meeting discussing a proposed state "foundation formula" for school funding and warned that the details will determine whether the change improves equity or introduces new problems.
A committee member said, "I think the foundation formula can be done well. I also think it can be done poorly," and pressed whether funds distributed under the new formula would be prescriptive or left to local districts to spend. The member said that question "will be answered" by the Legislature and that the new system could either direct dollars to students' needs or simply augment general district budgets.
Committee members raised several recurring concerns. They urged that any formula include guardrails so future legislatures cannot underfund the formula or repurpose the money, noting past legal challenges to inadequate school funding. One member said many states have been sued over inadequate funding, and another cited an example in which a state had a foundation formula that "haven't funded it adequately," saying court decisions and funding adequacy will remain points of tension.
Members discussed equity between wealthy and poorer towns. A committee member noted that small towns with lower property wealth can face difficulty raising local revenue compared with wealthier towns, and recommended an equalization mechanism be built into the formula. The committee also discussed school size and program offerings: small enrollment in many towns limits opportunities for activities such as sports, robotics or specialized classes, which larger or regional schools can offer.
Panelists and members also flagged data quality. One member said the Agency of Education (AOE) has been behind in delivering accurate data and that some data provided to districts this year were not correct. "Crunching the numbers may be harder than normal," the member said, adding the committee will do its own analysis even as AOE works to improve its data. The member added that AOE had been producing more data in recent weeks than in prior years, but cautioned the information "will never be perfect."
Committee members referenced other states as context: Colorado was cited for a change that went "from 5 to... 30%" (as discussed at the meeting) and Wyoming was mentioned as a state that has faced tension between a foundation formula and its actual funding. Members stressed the devil is in the detail and said they expect extensive number-crunching and follow-up work as formal proposals arrive.
The committee indicated next steps include further technical work, meetings with legislative colleagues (the transcript records a planned meeting with "Senator Bond"), and deeper analysis of AOE data and cost drivers. Members also warned that public reaction is likely when the proposals are released and urged staff and legislators to be ready to respond to constituent inquiries.
The session ended as a debrief; members said the pace will pick up in coming weeks and the committee will continue to review funding models and data before any legislative action.
