Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conservation Outlot Replat topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves replat creating city-owned conservation outlot after debate over precedent and financing
Summary
The commission approved a replat of three lots to create an unbuildable conservation outlot that the city will acquire and place under a 99-year conservation easement; commissioners and public commenters debated whether city financing and lack of formal criteria for conservation easements set a problematic precedent.
The Edina Planning Commission on Jan. 15 recommended approval of a subdivision (replat) that will convert three existing residential lots on Highwood Drive and Pine Grove into two enlarged residential lots and a city-owned outlot protected by a conservation easement.
City staff said the replat formalizes a plan the City Council approved in concept in April 2024 and that the council directed staff to proceed through the subdivision process. Staff described the outlot as unbuildable because steep slopes and mature trees make construction impractical; the city would acquire the land up front and recover the cost over time through assessments on nearby properties. According to staff and the applicant, the city acquisition price for the outlot was set at $150,000 and the cost will be repaid over time by neighboring property owners; staff said seven neighbors on the block and three properties on Pine Grove would share assessment responsibility.
Owner and applicant Andrew Carter told commissioners he purchased one of the lots and organized neighbors to cover the assessment share. Staff explained the outlot would be conveyed to the city with a conservation easement prohibiting structures, trails and general removal of trees except to remove diseased or dead trees; the easement term discussed in the hearing is 99 years, the maximum allowable term discussed for this type of conservation easement.
Public comment included a resident who said the parcel had been bought in 2023 for $300,000 and questioned why the city would finance a privately motivated easement rather than pursue alternative conservation tools such as a donation or a private land trust transaction. The speaker also noted the city has no formal standards for purchasing conservation easements and called the parcel small for this kind of purchase.
Commissioners split on the policy implications. Several said the replat itself posed no land-use issue because the resulting lots are consistent with code and the outlot would preserve mature trees and reduce runoff risk; others said they were uneasy that the council had already directed staff to pursue acquisition without a citywide policy and that the city lacked project-selection criteria for conservation easements paid with public money.
In roll-call voting on the motion to approve the plat, the commission recorded five votes in favor, one abstention and one no: Commissioner Elkhire (Aye), Commissioner Smith (Aye), Commissioner Day (Abstain), Commissioner Bornstein (Aye), Commissioner Feldt (Aye), Commissioner Hahnemann (Aye) and Chair Bennett (Nay). The motion carried and the plat will move to subsequent council action where the council will consider the easement, the assessment documents and the vacation of a minor drainage/utility easement that staff said contains no active utilities.
Staff noted the city will maintain the outlot and enforce the easement on a complaint basis; the parcel will not be developed as a park or trail and can be managed only for public-benefit purposes defined in the conservation easement. Staff also said the council previously reviewed a similar arrangement about seven to eight years ago and had used the city to finance acquisition with repayments from neighbors.
Commissioners and staff suggested the city consider developing explicit criteria for future conservation-easement acquisitions — including minimum public benefit thresholds — as part of upcoming planning and zoning ordinance work.
