Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conservation Funding And Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
NRCS: Utah allotted $8M for conservation programs; easement pipeline faces FSA eligibility hurdles
Summary
NRCS staff reported a state allocation of about $8 million (split between IRA and farm-bill-related pools), a high volume of ASAP and RCPP applications, and recurring problems with Farm Service Agency eligibility and document shelf life that are delaying easement closings.
Scott (NRCS) told the roundtable that Utah had been allocated about $8,000,000 across IRA and farm-bill-related pools for conservation projects and that the agency is working through a heavy application load.
"This winter has been very busy. We received up to upwards of 26, ASAP applications," Scott said, and added that NRCS had received multiple RCPP applications and had selected five projects against the state's general allocation plus one IRA project so far.
He said the state allocation of roughly $8,000,000 was split approximately $4,000,000 from IRA and $4,000,000 from the Farm Bill pool, but that funds are already constrained. NRCS has submitted requests for additional funding and plans a second request round with a May 1 deadline after an initial February 1 submission. Scott listed three larger single-project requests (around $8,000,000, $5,000,000 and $1,200,000) under consideration for supplemental funding.
Scott described a recurring administrative hurdle: landowner eligibility paperwork that must be current in Farm Service Agency records. He said RCPP-related easements must be "in a compliance status" before NRCS will execute contracts; other programs allow file status through certain steps but require compliance before payment. Scott proposed a training for FSA field-office staff to reduce confusion about differing program requirements and shelf life for AGI/IRS documentation.
The NRCS speaker also reported the team was close to closing three more easements and expected one to close by the end of the month and others by March, while noting multiple dates and administrative review steps can slow timelines.
Why it matters: funding allocations, program eligibility and document-shelf-life rules materially affect whether conservation easements move from agreement to closing and how many projects can be supported by federal funds.
Ending: Scott said NRCS will pursue additional funds and set up FSA training and that partners should be prepared to manage documentation timelines to avoid delays in contract execution.
