Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears administration plan to expand public‑nuisance code to cover biohazards, needles and trash
Summary
Administration officials presented a package of proposed ordinances to clarify the city’s public‑nuisance authority and expand definitions of trash, solid waste and biohazardous material; council members discussed enforcement, fee documentation and tax‑lien collection before introducing the ordinances.
The Utica administration presented a legislative package to clarify and expand the city’s public‑nuisance code to address trash, biohazardous waste and other conditions that officials say create persistent public nuisances.
At the Jan. 15 meeting, staff described proposed ordinance 13 as an amendment to the public‑nuisance provisions to explicitly include accumulations of trash and to update language referencing cannabis offenses to match changes in state penal law. Subsequent ordinances (14–16) would amend definitions for trash, solid waste and add “biohazard” to the code so the city can abate and recover costs for removal of needles, human waste and other hazardous materials. Staff said the changes allow the city to document and assess abatement costs and, where appropriate, place the charges on property tax bills.
Council members asked how charges are calculated and documented. Administration representatives said costs would be based on actual documented expenses—staff time, equipment, tipping fees and contractor charges—and that the city already has procedures for accounting labor and disposal costs when it abates grass and trash. Officials said the change is intended to make tax‑liability enforcement more effective; under recent state law changes the city can recover abatement costs more readily when they are placed on tax rolls. The mayor and administration staff emphasized internal coordination with the parks, DPW and engineering departments to make abatement and billing feasible.
One proposed measure discussed but referred to committee would require distribution of self‑retractable needles where syringe programs are operated; council members asked to study cost and implementation details before a vote. In procedural action the council introduced ordinances 13–16 and 19 for consideration and indicated willingness to advance the package through committee and full council.
