Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Uptown Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission again tables proposal to raise allowable uptown retail tenant size
Summary
The commission tabled a zoning text amendment that would raise the by‑right allowable floor area for a single Uptown retail tenant from 10,000 to 20,000 square feet to allow staff to craft more targeted language and address concerns about bars, restaurant demand on public services and conditional‑use safeguards.
The Planning Commission chose not to advance a proposal to increase the by‑right maximum single‑tenant retail floor area in the Uptown district from 10,000 to 20,000 square feet, instead tabling the amendment for further staff work and language refinements.
Economic development staff and commissioners described the proposal as an attempt to make it easier for certain larger retailers — such as an urban‑format marketplace or similar tenant — to locate in Uptown and to encourage ground‑floor activation in currently vacant large spaces. Seth Gropenbaker, the city’s economic development specialist, said examples in other markets include compact Urban Target/marketplace formats and that a typical Walgreens building measures roughly 14,000–15,000 square feet, illustrating the size band the amendment would affect.
Commissioners and staff raised several concerns. Fire and police representatives earlier reported that food‑service and late‑night entertainment uses can demand higher public‑safety resources; commissioners worried that allowing a by‑right 20,000‑square‑foot retail classification without clear limits could enable large late‑night entertainment venues or other high‑demand uses to enter as a permitted use rather than through a conditional use review. Commissioners discussed options including a narrower, targeted definition that would allow retail uses up to 20,000 square feet but explicitly exclude bars/nightclub uses or require conditional use for certain categories. The commission asked staff to return with more surgical language that would permit the targeted retail types the city wants while retaining safeguards for public safety and compatibility.
Outcome: The commission took the item off the table and then voted to table the amendment again to allow staff to prepare revised language that would be narrower in scope (for example, permitting retail use up to 20,000 square feet but excluding certain high‑impact uses or adding conditional‑use triggers). No final ordinance was adopted; the item remains under commission review.
