Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board continues hearing on sale of county-owned parcel next to Giannoni Park after no written bids

2120434 · January 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A public hearing on sale of a four-acre county parcel adjacent to Giannoni Park received no written bids; the board set a $10,000 minimum oral bid and later continued the matter to a date uncertain for further community outreach and review.

The Board of Supervisors opened a Jan. 14 hearing on the possible sale of an undeveloped, four-acre county parcel adjacent to Giannoni Park in Stockton and then continued the matter to a date uncertain after no written bids were received.

General Services staff said the parcel (Assessor’s Parcel Number 143-110-05) had been subdivided from Giannoni Park and proposed for sale as surplus exempt property to be used for affordable housing; a previously adopted board resolution limits sale proceeds to park development funds. The clerk reported no written bids at the hearing and staff set a $10,000 minimum oral bid to allow offers at the public hearing.

Supervisors asked staff whether expanding the park or investing in existing parks might be preferable to an as-is sale. County counsel reminded the board that the prior resolution declaring the site exempt surplus tied the property to affordable housing as a required use by any buyer. Supervisor comments flagged neighborhood park needs and asked staff to return with community outreach and additional information. A motion to continue the matter to a date uncertain passed 5-0.

Why it matters: The parcel is county-owned land adjacent to an existing neighborhood park. Board members said they want to reconcile competing uses — potential affordable housing versus park expansion and existing park repairs — before any sale proceeds are spent.

Ending: The board continued the sale hearing to a date uncertain for further staff follow-up and community input on whether to hold the parcel as parkland or proceed with disposition under the exempt-surplus housing requirement.