Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Key actions from the Roseville City Council meeting, Jan. 14, 2025
Summary
Summary of formal motions and votes recorded during the Jan. 14 Roseville City Council meeting, including consent agenda approval, an abatement resolution, receiving the FY2024 audit, and adoption of the 2025–2029 parks master plan.
At its Jan. 14 meeting, the Roseville City Council recorded several formal actions and voice-vote approvals. The motions below are taken from the meeting record and transcript.
• Consent agenda: Motion to approve the consent agenda (mover cited in transcript as Councilman Leticia; seconder reported as Mayor Pro Tem). Outcome: Approved by voice vote. The transcript does not list individual roll-call votes or items removed for separate discussion.
• Abatement resolution — 28751 Maple: Motion to approve the resolution for abatement of a public nuisance at 28751 Maple (mover: Councilman Leticia; second: Councilwoman Hagerty). Outcome: Approved by voice vote. No property owner appeared at the meeting.
• Receive and file — 2024 Financial Audit: Motion to receive and file the FY2024 audit presented by Plante Moran (mover: Mr. Thomason; second: Councilman Knox). Outcome: Approved by voice vote. Auditors issued an unmodified (clean) opinion on financial statements and ARPA grant administration.
• Adopt resolution — 2025–2029 Joint Parks and Recreation Master Plan: Motion to adopt the joint parks and recreation master plan for the Recreation Authority of Roseville and East Point, City of East Point, and City of Roseville (mover: Councilman Knox; second: Councilwoman Hagerty). Outcome: Approved by voice vote. Staff will submit the adopted plan to the Michigan DNR by Feb. 1 for grant eligibility.
• Adjournment: Motion to adjourn (mover: Mayor Pro Tem Haass; second: Councilwoman Hagar). Outcome: Approved by voice vote.
The meeting transcript records voice votes for each motion; no roll-call tallies with individual yes/no names were read into the record during these items. If an item requires further action (for example, abatement implementation, DNR submission for the master plan, or follow-up reporting on pension/OPEB funding), staff indicated follow-up tasks or future reporting would be provided at subsequent meetings.
