Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Artificial Turf Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Titusville commission recommends banning synthetic plants and artificial turf in landscaping
Summary
After months of requests and public testimony, the Titusville Environmental Commission voted to recommend that City Council prohibit synthetic plants — including artificial turf — in landscaping and yards; staff will forward the commission’s redlined language.
The Titusville Environmental Commission voted to recommend that City Council prohibit synthetic plant materials — explicitly including artificial turf — in landscaping and yards.
City staff presented a draft artificial-turf ordinance that would have allowed limited, regulated uses of synthetic turf in areas not required to meet minimum landscape-planting requirements. Commissioners and multiple public commenters contested that approach, citing research and environmental concerns including plastic degradation, PFAS/PFOS contamination risks and sterilization of soil under replacement synthetic surfaces.
Commission discussion focused on whether the current municipal code’s phrasing — which staff said had been interpreted as prohibiting synthetic materials only when used in lieu of required plantings — left a loophole permitting artificial turf above the minimum landscaping standards. Commissioners resolved to eliminate that ambiguity.
The commission voted to delete the proposed Section 30-325 in its entirety and to retain a single, plain-language provision in the plant-materials code: synthetic or artificial material in the form of trees, shrubs, vines or ground covers (such as artificial turf) are prohibited in landscaping and yards. Commissioners also asked staff to preserve, separately, the technical criteria that staff had compiled in case City Council prefers to limit or condition any narrow exceptions.
The roll-call vote was unanimous. Staff said the commission’s amended recommendation and proposed whereas language will be forwarded to City Council for either input or advertisement for a public hearing.
Why it matters: A prohibition would prevent future approvals of artificial turf as a substitute for live plantings and would affect pending or future variance requests and applications for single-family yards, commercial landscaping and other exterior projects.
