Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Abandoned Properties topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Englewood advisory committee asks city attorney to research abandoned-property practices
Summary
The Code Enforcement Advisory Committee voted to ask the City Attorney—s Office to research how other municipalities handle abandoned and absentee-owned properties after discussion about enforcement limits, liens and health-related abatements.
The Code Enforcement Advisory Committee for Englewood City voted to ask the City Attorney's Office to research best practices used by neighboring municipalities for managing abandoned and absentee-owned properties.
Committee members said a small number of long-unmaintained parcels is harming adjacent properties and creating safety concerns. The request followed extended discussion about administrative and judicial abatement options, county lien procedures and the limits of city authority when owners cannot be located.
Why it matters: committee members said unresolved vacant properties can depress neighboring property values and create public-safety hazards (rats, trespassing, arson, drug activity). Committee members asked the City Attorney's Office to survey other cities— approaches and recommend ordinance changes or administrative steps Englewood could take.
Discussion highlights: members estimated there are roughly a dozen properties where the city has not been able to contact owners. Staff explained that Englewood uses administrative abatement for health and safety work and can record a lien through the county to recover abatement costs; larger judicial abatements can result in sale orders and faster recovery in some cases. Staff noted that county processes and intergovernmental agreements currently cover many upfront abatement costs and that a recorded lien (and interest) is intended to reimburse the city when taxes are paid or when a property is sold.
On enforcement mechanics, staff described the two abatement tracks: administrative abatement (used when notice, appeal and process are followed) and judicial abatement (used when the city issues a summons and proceeds through municipal court). Staff also said the county public health department can issue orders in infestation cases and that emergency abatements may be made immediately when a health or safety risk is present.
Quote: AJ, a staff member, described vehicle enforcement rules during the meeting: "It has to be able to be driven under its own power legally on the right of way. If it doesn't meet that, then it would be an inoperable vehicle." This explanation was given while committee members clarified enforcement thresholds for vehicles on private property versus the public right-of-way.
Action and vote: a motion asking the City Attorney's Office to review practices used by surrounding municipalities and recommend possible revisions to Englewood procedures for abandoned or absentee-owned properties was moved, seconded and approved; all members present voted "aye." The motion directed staff and the City Attorney's Office to return with findings and suggested ordinance language.
Next steps: staff said they will work with the City Attorney's Office, utilities and finance to produce data (including how the city and county track vacant properties and how utilities usage can indicate vacancy). The committee asked to be kept informed of the research timeline and materials for the next meeting.
