Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Strategic Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates mission wording, charter language and long-term vision for Fairgrounds campus
Summary
Board members discussed balancing charter mandates and financial sustainability while reconceptualizing the fairgrounds as a multiuse 'live, work, play' campus; members disagreed over whether the mission should explicitly reference current revenue-producing events or be more forward-looking.
Board members on Jan. 13 revisited the strategic work plan and debated how narrowly or broadly to frame the fairgrounds' mission. The discussion focused on two tensions: honoring charter and private-act language that describes required activities, and building a financially sustainable campus model for the future.
Chair Jasper Hendrix and other board members said the board must balance the charter requirements — which direct operating certain events — with a broader vision. One board member summarized that concept this way: "When I think about the fairgrounds, I think about it as a multipurpose recreation and event campus for Nashville."
Several board members urged a forward-looking mission emphasizing mixed use and neighborhood-building. "This is actually a true place where you can actually live, play, and work," one board member said, arguing the campus should be marketed as an integrated neighborhood around Geodis Park, the racetrack and new development parcels. Board discussion also noted practical constraints: private acts and the Metro charter still reference the Tennessee State Fair and certain authorities the board no longer exercises (for example, bonding or levying certain taxes). Legal changes would require council action, a charter amendment and, ultimately, a public vote.
Board members asked staff to bring revised mission-language options that honor charter obligations while describing a longer-term vision for the campus and to include the financial sustainability question in the board's strategic planning work. Board members also raised marketing and wayfinding as tools to help reframe the site in the public mind and noted leasing progress at nearby development parcels.
No formal vote was taken; board members agreed to continue the mission-discussion and to provide drafts for the next meeting.
