Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Liquor License Rooftop topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gansevoort operators seek transfer and rooftop-hour changes as neighbors press for sound limits
Summary
Operators of the Gansevoort Hotel told Community Board Q's State Liquor Authority committee they seek a transfer of the hotel license, an alteration to add cellar space back to the hotel license, and restoration of earlier rooftop hours for a portion of the roof.
Get email alerts on the Liquor License Rooftop topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Operators of the Gansevoort Hotel told Community Board Q's State Liquor Authority committee they are seeking a corporate transfer and several license alterations, including adding cellar space back to the hotel license and restoring earlier late-night rooftop hours for a portion of the licensed rooftop.
The items drew the most public attention of the meeting. Neighbors raised complaints about past noise and street crowding and urged the board to require sound testing, door controls and clear hours. Hotel representatives said they have invested in sound reduction and would accept stipulations and tests to address community concerns.
Why it matters: the applications would move cellar space formerly restricted to a private members club back into the hotel license, change which legal entity holds the hotel license, and permit the membersclubportion of the rooftop interior to operate late into the morning. Residents said that, because the rooftop includes retractable walls and glass-enclosed areas, clearer rules are needed so future operators cannot rely on personal relationships alone to prevent noise impacts.
Committee chair Donna Raffley led detailed questions about which rooftop sections are licensed to the hotel and which belong to the private members club. Hotel representatives described three elevator access patterns, separate entry points for the club and for hotel guests, and the intended separation of member-only spaces.
Public commenters urged limits. Resident Zach Weinstein said he appreciated recent hotel staff efforts but asked the board to clarify existing stipulations and require that music not exceed background levels in the interior rooftop space. Adjacent residents Bill Hoffman and Suzanne Ronson described repeated instances of patrons blocking sidewalks and of noise transmitting into homes, and asked for a requirement that any outdoor pickup points be moved away from the immediate frontage.
Hotel management acknowledged the history of turnover at other nearby venues and said the building's operators had spent money on sound mitigation and would stipulate to sound testing and to keeping specific doors closed when amplified sound was used. They also proposed reservation-only entry and using a holding area downstairs to prevent lines outside.
The committee discussed, but did not vote on, draft stipulations: limits on exterior music (no music after midnight on certain outdoor terraces), a seated-service requirement on the east terrace after midnight, closing glass walls and doors when amplified music is in the interior rooftop "loft," and a requirement that the clubcellar space be transferred to the hotel license before the hotel transfer is finalized. Hotel representatives accepted community sound testing and an agreement to meet with neighbors after a sound test.
Next steps: applicants will file the transfer and alteration paperwork with the State Liquor Authority and with the committee indicated they will produce a revised floor plan and circulate it to the board. Committee members asked for written stipulations that capture the door, sound-testing and reservation measures before any recommendation to the SLA.
Ending: The committee left the applications open for formal paperwork and written stipulations. Members told hotel counsel the board is willing to work toward a resolution that allows operation flexibility while preserving enforceable limits to protect adjacent residents.

