Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Higher Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves substitute to remove duplicative CAEP accreditation requirement for educator programs

2118419 · January 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HB1674, with a substitute, would remove a mandatory CAEP accreditation requirement for certain Virginia professional education programs and allow reliance on other national accreditations; the subcommittee reported the substitute 7–1.

The K‑12 Education Subcommittee reported House Bill 1674 with a substitute, 7–1. The measure would remove a statutory requirement that Virginia professional education programs obtain and maintain accreditation from the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) in favor of allowing other recognized national accreditation standards for certain programs, including school counseling and school psychology programs that use specialized accrediting bodies.

Sponsor’s explanation: Delegate Amy Laufer said institutions and program leaders told her the CAEP requirement produced duplicative reviews for programs that also pursue national accreditations specific to counseling and school psychology. The substitute would permit flexibility and allow programs to rely on relevant professional accrediting organizations without the additional CAEP burden.

Support and testimony: Joel Hanel, representing the Virginia Association of Colleges and Teacher Educators and an accreditation manager at the University of Virginia, detailed duplicative reporting, site visits and administrative burdens that prompt the request. The Virginia Education Association also spoke in favor.

Committee action: After agreeing to the substitute and receiving supportive testimony from higher-education accreditation professionals, the subcommittee voted 7–1 to report the measure. No organized opposition appeared in the hearing record.

Ending: Proponents said the change would reduce duplication and administrative costs for teacher-preparation programs while maintaining quality through professional accrediting bodies; the bill will move forward to the next stage in the legislative process.