Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Dams topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances dam‑safety bill to streamline remediation and clarify local authority
Summary
The committee voted unanimously to report a bill that clarifies the Department of Conservation and Recreation's emergency authority over dams and seeks to streamline remediation responsibilities for low‑hazard dams by shifting certain remediation‑plan duties to dam owners, with local governments' participation made permissive in the amendments.
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Dams topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senators in the Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources Committee advanced legislation to clarify emergency authority under the Virginia Dam Safety Act and to streamline remediation and enforcement procedures for low‑hazard dams.
Senator Tim French, speaking for the measure, said the bill and accompanying line amendments are intended to make it easier for owners of low‑risk dams to comply with statutory requirements and to reduce enforcement delays. The bill would give the Department of Conservation and Recreation clearer ability to work with local governments during emergencies while making local participation permissive rather than mandatory.
DCR Director Matt Wells told the committee that the bill would clarify how the department's emergency authority could extend to local governments without compelling local action. He described a recent Hanover County situation in which local equipment could have been used to avert a failure but the authority to act was uncertain. "What the bill seeks to do is to clarify that the department has the authority to order the local government to get involved," Wells said, and the amendments "make it clear that that authority can be exercised with the agreement of the local government and not just by fiat."
The measure also changes the remediation planning process so that owners — who already pay for inspections and engineering — prepare remediation plans that are then reviewed by the department, rather than having the Soil and Water Conservation Board develop the plan after the department orders inspections. DCR testified that the change should shorten the back‑and‑forth and reduce costs for owners.
Multiple conservation groups and local soil and water conservation districts testified in support of the bill; no opposition was recorded in committee.
The committee voted to report and refer the bill to the Finance Committee; the roll call was Ayes 13, Noes 0.
