Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animals And Pets topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Las Vegas panel advances ordinances to limit pet sales and raise abandonment fine to $1,000
Summary
The recommending committee approved two ordinances on Jan. 13 that would limit how many animals pet shops and breeders may sell to a single household each year and raise the minimum fine for animal abandonment to $1,000; both go to full council on Jan. 15.
The Las Vegas recommending committee on Jan. 13 approved two ordinances aimed at reducing animal hoarding and abandonment: bill 2024-45 would limit the number of particular animals pet shops or breeders may sell to one person or household during a calendar year and add quarterly reporting requirements; bill 2024-46 would amend LVMC 7.44.040 to make the minimum penalty for animal abandonment $1,000.
Supporters and animal-welfare organizations told the committee the measures respond to repeated hoarding and abandonment cases, including a recent multi-jurisdictional investigation involving a couple who bought large numbers of animals from a national pet retailer. "I'm here today for our organization to support the 2 ordinances that will increase the, abandonment fine to a $1,000... and also put, more oversight on pet stores," said Bryce Henderson, president of No Kill Las Vegas.
The sales-limit ordinance (2024-45) mirrors the limits on animal possession in most species but specifically caps sales of guinea pigs to two per buyer per calendar year; staff said there is no possession limit on guinea pigs because rescue groups asked not to restrict their ability to take in animals. City staff described an implementation plan that relies on existing federal reporting used by many licensed sellers; pet businesses would receive a standardized spreadsheet from the Department of Public Safety (DPS) and must submit quarterly reports once city forms are available. "That'll be a separate report... I'll go ahead and create a template for the businesses so that it's uniform," Rudy Tovar, DPS manager, said.
Violations of the sales or reporting rules are citable as civil or criminal offenses; staff said the civil option is available. During the presentation, staff identified a $500 penalty for violations of reporting or sales provisions as set in the ordinance text. "Those penalties are set forth in the ordinance," staff said during the hearing.
The abandonment ordinance (2024-46) removes abandonment from a graduated cruelty schedule and sets a flat minimum penalty of $1,000 for abandonment. Council members and advocates said the higher minimum is intended as a deterrent and a public statement that the city takes abandonment seriously. "When you abandon a dog, you abandon it... That's why the $1,000," Councilwoman Victoria Seaman said when moving the measure forward.
Rescue and shelter leaders described the fiscal and operational strain caused by abandoned and hoarded animals. "The fiscal impact of this, not only with our city shelters that is in over is completely overrun... $1,000 for someone that abandons an [animal] still doesn't seem enough to me," Deborah Mitchell of Community Cat Angels said. Laurie Herron, executive director of Nevada SPCA, said the shelter system took nearly 1,500 owner surrenders last year and witnessed cases of animals dumped in carriers, totes and pillowcases in extreme heat.
Staff told the committee DPS expects roughly 10 businesses licensed to sell animals within city limits will submit the quarterly reports and that administrative staff will review submissions to identify compliance issues; audits can be triggered if reports are missing. "If they have not given us anything, we start reaching out to them... it can be random or it can be actually on the quarter," Tovar said. Tovar said enforcement can range from administrative follow-up to civil citations and, for egregious cases, criminal action involving marshals or Metro when warrants or greater law-enforcement support are needed.
The committee approved both bills; bill 2024-45 and bill 2024-46 were moved forward to the Jan. 15, 2025 city council meeting for final hearing. Members who asked for additional data requested staff supply counts of prior abandonment citations and other historical enforcement information for committee and council review.
Ending: Advocates at the recommending committee urged the city to pair legal penalties with outreach and surrender options so owners in crisis will relinquish animals to shelters rather than abandon them. The city will consider the ordinances again at the Jan. 15 council meeting.
