Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campaign Finance Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legislative research analyst summarizes interim committee recommendations on campaign finance clarity and contribution limits
Summary
A senior research analyst briefed the Committee on Elections about the 2023 special committee on governmental ethics reform, recommending clearer statutory definitions (coordination, giving in the name of another, PAC), consideration of higher contribution limits, and alignment with federal guidance where appropriate.
Elena Rudder, senior research analyst for the Legislative Research Department, gave the committee a brief overview of the 2023 special committee on governmental ethics reform’s report and its recommendations for campaign finance changes.
“The committee recommended defining the term ‘coordination,’ clarifying the definition of ‘giving in the name of another’ or ‘contribution in the name of another’ and clarifying the definition of ‘political committee or political action committee or PAC,’” Rudder said. She said the committee also recommended considering increases to contribution limits.
Rudder summarized the interim committee’s activities, noting a presentation from Professor John McGinnis of Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law that reviewed Supreme Court precedent including Buckley v. Valeo and urged clear statutory distinctions between independent expenditures and coordinated expenditures. She said the interim committee heard from the governor’s chief of staff, who supported transparency, limits on campaign contributions and considered increasing contribution limits or making party limits unlimited with safeguards to protect primaries.
Rudder said the committee heard public comment from 10 conferees — with two providing written testimony — covering concerns about vague statutory definitions, disclosure thresholds, transparency and contribution limits. The executive director of the Kansas Governmental Ethics Commission presented on the commission’s role, investigations and legislative recommendations. The Institute for Free Speech presented recommendations that included indexing contribution limits to inflation, raising disclosure thresholds and avoiding regulation of grassroots advocacy.
Rudder closed by noting the interim report reiterates its conclusions and recommendations and that the materials are available on the legislature’s website and the committee’s shared drive.
