Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Noise Quiet Zone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents deliver petition as Roselle board presses quiet-zone talks after spike in horn noise
Summary
Residents representing downtown condos and businesses urged the Village Board to pursue a federal- and state-level process to create a railway quiet zone along Roselle’s Main Street corridor; trustees and staff described regulatory complexity and said they will continue negotiations and host community engagement.
Frank Trocchio told the Village Board on Jan. 14 that downtown residents and businesses have collected more than 278 signatures seeking a quiet zone on Roselle’s Main Street corridor to reduce frequent train horn noise.
Trocchio said the noise from increased train traffic has reduced quality of life for people living near the tracks and has disrupted outdoor dining and community events. “It’s become a detriment to their quality of life,” he said, adding that the petition represents condominium and business support for quiet-zone work.
The petition and public comment prompted an extensive staff update during the village’s State of the Village presentation. Village leadership said the legal and technical path to a quiet zone is complicated by changes to federal and state oversight and by necessary cooperation from rail providers.
Mayor Polsky and staff recounted a history of the issue dating to a 2015 study and noted that federal and state jurisdiction has shifted. The board said a 2015 local decision prioritized Roanoke/Rodenburg Road for a quiet zone, and subsequent federal and state regulatory changes moved oversight toward the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC), which staff said lacks a binding enforcement mechanism for some cross-jurisdiction issues. Meanwhile the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) retains regulatory authority in other parts of the process.
Village staff said the 2023 merger of Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern (CPKC) helped by requiring the railroad to fund parts of quiet-zone establishment, but staff warned substantial concessions could be required — including possible closure of some vehicular crossings — and that major elements are still subject to voluntary agreements with Metra and freight railroads. Metro (Metra) submitted its list of required mitigations in January, staff said, giving Roselle more detail to use in next-step negotiations.
Trustees and the administrator said the village will keep pushing with state and federal lawmakers and the railroad and intends to hold a dedicated community forum to walk through trade-offs and mitigation options with residents. Staff emphasized that some equipment required (for example pedestrian gates) has long lead times — in one example staff mentioned 24–36 months — so approvals would not equate to immediate change.
The board and staff repeatedly framed the issue as balancing safety and noise: federal and agency rules require horns for safety in many conditions, and quiet zones require compensating safety measures such as longer gates, additional barriers, or closing crossings. Staff noted that current overnight quiet-zone practices are voluntary and allow horns when rail operators judge a safety risk.
Ending
Trustees and staff told residents they will continue negotiations with rail agencies and lawmakers and plan a public forum so the community can review specific mitigation options before the board makes any formal decisions. The village reiterated that any quiet-zone outcome would require trade-offs and multiagency cooperation and would take months to years to implement.
