Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fort Lauderdale special magistrate hearing: dozens of property owners ordered to fix violations, pay fines or reappear
Summary
At the Jan. 14 special magistrate hearing the city recorded findings of fact, imposed fines, and set compliance deadlines across dozens of code‑enforcement cases covering exterior maintenance, overgrowth, illegal land use and vacation‑rental certificates.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of Fort Lauderdale’s special magistrate held a hearing on Jan. 14 that produced a string of compliance orders, findings of fact and fines across a wide range of property‑maintenance and land‑use cases.
Why it matters: The magistrate’s rulings affect dozens of property owners and several commercial operators; they set deadlines for repairs, confirm findings of fact for repeat offenders, and impose monetary penalties when violations were left uncorrected.
Selected outcomes from the hearing (cases, action and deadline):
- CE24090470 (3616 Southwest 21st Court, Owner Ryan Patrick Palmer): Code inspector requested 28 days per some violations; magistrate granted 119 days to comply (new compliance date May 13, 2025) for exterior repairs, with $50/day thereafter.
- CE24100225 (2311 Southwest 35th Avenue, Owner Tanya Thomas Timbrez): Inspector sought 28 days per violation; the magistrate granted 119 days to May 13, 2025 as compliance date after the owner described medical hardship for an occupant, with fines to run thereafter.
- CE24070773 (300 Northeast 4th Street, Dependable Equities LLC): Trees were removed without permits. The property accepted a fine schedule: $150 per tree for 10 removed ($1,500) plus 28 days to complete after‑the‑fact permitting.
- CE24100462 (1517 Southeast 16th Street, Southport Raw Bar): (See separate article) $15,000 fine imposed for illegal grease discharge plus 84-day deadlines on related violations.
- CE24110038 (733 Middle River Drive, Anthony and Kristen DeGrati): Property cited for event‑related nuisance (open house/valet); magistrate reduced city’s requested fine to $5,000 and entered a finding of fact (see separate article).
- CE24090226 (3391 Southwest 22nd Street, Ryan Christopher Downs): Multiple property maintenance items; magistrate set 28‑ and 56‑day deadlines on specific violations and granted 56 days to address commercial vehicle overnight parking concerns while directing further discussion with city staff.
- Vacation rental noncompliance: Multiple properties were cited for operating vacation rentals without current certificates (examples: 1517 NE 17th Terrace; units at 4040 Gulfstream Drive; 5451 NE 22nd Ave). Each case received a compliance window (commonly 15 days) and fines structured to begin if certificates were not obtained.
- Repeat offenders and findings of fact: Several recurring cases were logged as findings of fact so future recurrences can be enforced as repeat violations with daily fines (examples included properties at 427 West Sunrise Boulevard and 500 Northeast Third Avenue).
How the hearing worked: City inspectors presented photographs, pre‑hearing inspection results and requested specific compliance windows and daily‑fine amounts. Property owners or their representatives typically described mitigation steps, hardship or permitting timelines. The magistrate balanced those explanations against the evidence and sometimes reduced fines, granted extensions, or recorded findings of fact. In several cases magistrate granted order‑to‑reappear dates rather than immediate fines so progress could be reviewed.
What to watch next: Property owners who were given extended windows must either complete repairs or apply for necessary permits by their deadlines; otherwise daily fines will resume. The city will post reinspection results and new hearings if noncompliance continues.

