Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Materials Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Petaluma secondary librarians present updated library materials reconsideration policy to board
Summary
Secondary librarians presented a first reading of a revised library-materials policy that separates library and instructional materials procedures and narrows who can file challenges to materials to people with children at the affected school.
Secondary librarians presented a proposed update to the district’s materials-reconsideration process during the Jan. 14 board meeting, recommending a separate procedure for library materials and a narrower definition of the community eligible to file challenges.
Shannon Britton, librarian at Petaluma High School, and Nathan Labcap, librarian at Casa Grande High School, said the district’s existing policy had not been updated in about 20 years and did not distinguish between instructional materials and library collections. The proposed changes separate library materials and add appendices with suggested forms and step-by-step guidance for principals and stakeholders.
Why it matters: the revision would limit the ability to challenge library materials to “community” members defined as people who have children enrolled at the school where a title is held, rather than any outside organization. The librarians said that change aligns with American Library Association recommendations and practices adopted by larger districts and responds to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s June 1, 2023 request that districts review materials policies.
Policy details and process Shannon Britton said the update clarifies the shared decision-making process: challenges would be reviewed by a group of stakeholders at the school — teachers, parents, students and administrators — rather than by a single individual. Nathan Labcap said the proposed policy includes templates for forms and procedures adapted from Los Angeles Unified and other districts to help principals and staff follow a consistent process.
Board context and next step A board member noted that the policy relates to board policies 1312.2 and 6161.1; staff confirmed both policies had not been comprehensively updated in decades. Staff advised the board that the policy presented on Jan. 14 was a first reading and that the full recommended text and appendices would be emailed to trustees and returned for a subsequent reading and possible adoption.
Ending The board took no final action at the first reading and directed staff to circulate the revised policy and supporting forms before the second reading.
