Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Financing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Redevelopment commission: 2024 TIF receipts hit $16.99 million; staff flags boundary housekeeping

2115044 · January 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff told the Greenwood Redevelopment Commission that preliminary 2024 tax-increment financing receipts totaled $16,985,763, a 9% increase over 2023 and about 70% growth since 2019. Staff also outlined likely boundary amendments and housekeeping affecting 10–20 parcels.

At its Jan. 14 meeting, the Greenwood Redevelopment Commission received an initial summary of 2024 tax-increment financing (TIF) revenue: staff reported preliminary receipts of $16,985,763, a 9% increase from the prior year and roughly 70% growth since 2019.

Adam, finance staff, presented the preliminary figures and cautioned they have not been fully reconciled or audited. "The redevelopment commission received $16,985,763 that is an increase of the prior year of 9%. It's the largest year on record, and is up approximately 70% since 2019," Adam said. He told commissioners he had distributed a packet showing distribution by allocation area and a comparison with 2025 estimates.

Adam said allocation-area results have shifted: East Side, Worsville Road, Central and Southwest now rank ahead of Fry Road in receipts. He also said newer allocation areas — including Emerson Point TIF, Hauser and Arlington Farms — are beginning to show positive growth.

The commission discussed next steps for TIF management reporting. Staff said a first draft of the April 15 gateway report is weeks away and asked for a commission member to help speed review; Commissioner Harris volunteered to assist and staff indicated they would coordinate with the president and secretary.

Staff also flagged likely boundary amendments as a future agenda item. Adam said several existing allocation-area boundaries were drawn anticipating commercial uses but now contain exempt users (for example churches or nonprofit users) or residential-for-sale parcels that cannot be captured in TIF revenue; staff estimated 10–20 parcels would be affected by housekeeping removals. He said changes would be drafted with counsel and returned to the commission for approval.

The items reported were informational; no formal ordinance or resolution was adopted at the meeting on these TIF boundary matters.