Johnson County board to seek new bids after unclear recycling contract with Waste Management

2113847 · January 15, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board discussed missing contract records with Waste Management for compactor and recycling processing, directed staff to seek pricing and continue service under current terms until contracts are confirmed or replaced.

Johnson County Solid Waste Management board members voted to continue using Waste Management under the company’s current terms while staff seeks pricing from other vendors after the district could not locate a written contract for recycling processing.

The board’s director, Jesse (Director, Johnson County Solid Waste Management), told members the district has been paying $750 per month for a compactor but only recently learned Waste Management was charging a $120-per-ton processing fee plus fuel surcharges. Jesse said the county has requested a copy of any contract since August 2024 but Waste Management had not produced documentation.

“The only contract they will give me is the Ray’s contract,” Jesse said, describing an unclear handover after Ray’s sold its operation. Jesse said the district paid four outstanding bills at the end of December to avoid service interruption while the issue was investigated.

Legal counsel Lynn Gray (Attorney, Johnson County Solid Waste Management) told the board she has seen similar problems: when larger vendors take over smaller ones, contract files can be incomplete. Gray said she had not seen evidence that the district is bound to an unexpired contract and supported staff continuing service while pursuing alternatives.

Board members and staff discussed soliciting quotes or bids for processing and compactor services. The board indicated consensus that staff should request pricing and pursue competitive proposals, but continue using Waste Management to ensure bins and collection remain active until new contracts are in place or Waste Management produces a contract.

The board’s action was procedural: members agreed that staff should seek pricing and report back; no termination of service was ordered. Kevin Walls (President/Chair, Johnson County Solid Waste Management) and other members voiced support for moving forward with getting comparative proposals.

The board did not identify a specific procurement timeline, and the transcript contains inconsistent numeric formatting for past billing amounts; staff said they would continue to document the paper trail and present findings at a future meeting.

Ending: The board asked staff to pursue pricing and to arrange a meeting with Waste Management representatives if necessary; staff will return with proposals and documentation at a future meeting.