Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utility Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears of AT&T request at PUCO that would shift costs of moving infrastructure to municipalities
Summary
City staff told council that AT&T filed with the Ohio Public Utilities Commission to change the rule so municipalities would pay to move AT&T infrastructure for road or city projects; the Ohio Municipal League and many municipalities are opposing the change and Bexley is monitoring the matter.
BEXLEY, Ohio — City staff informed the Bexley City Council on Jan. 14 that AT&T filed a request with the Ohio Public Utilities Commission (PUCO) to change who pays for moving the company’s infrastructure when road or city-improvement projects require relocation.
According to staff, AT&T’s proposed change would make municipalities—and ultimately local taxpayers—responsible for relocation costs now typically borne by the utility where the relocation is necessary for city projects. The Ohio Municipal League (OML) has acted quickly to oppose the proposal and has retained counsel; several municipalities already have joined the OML’s effort, and Bexley staff said the city may join formally if the matter proceeds.
“There is a hearing with the PUCO on [Jan.] 17,” a staff member said, and Bexley is monitoring the docket. Staff said the city is on record opposing the proposed rule change and is tracking whether further action is warranted.
Why it matters
If the PUCO approves the change, local governments could face substantial, unplanned costs when municipal projects require utilities to relocate lines or poles. The OML’s involvement signals a broader municipal concern across Ohio.
What’s next
Bexley staff will continue to monitor the PUCO docket and may join the OML or other municipal partners in formal filings as the hearing process unfolds.
