Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medicaid Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Health & Welfare committee briefed on Vermont Medicaid spending, FMAP and Green Mountain Care Board; clerk nomination approved
Summary
Committee received a briefing on Medicaid spending, the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP), the global commitment waiver and the role of the Green Mountain Care Board; members also approved a clerk nomination by voice vote.
Get email alerts on the Medicaid Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nolan, the meeting’s witness and presenter, told the Vermont Senate Health & Welfare Committee that total health spending for Vermonters across Medicare, Medicaid and out-of-pocket costs was about $6.4 billion in 2020 and that he estimates it is “probably over $8,000,000,000 today.”
He said Medicaid is one of the state’s largest spending categories and described how federal matching dollars affect state costs: “When you see the budget presented to you, this is our current FMAP. It's 58.81%, which means that the state share is 41.2%. But translated, that means for every dollar for every general fund or state dollar that we spend on Medicaid, we're getting a dollar 43 federal match, which grosses up to $2.43,” Nolan said.
The presentation outlined how federal funding and different FMAP rates (including enhanced FMAP for expansion populations and the Children’s Health Insurance Program) change the net cost to Vermont and the fiscal effects of cutting Medicaid. Nolan emphasized that cutting $1 from Medicaid reduces $2.43 in services under the current FMAP, and he described program-specific rates (for example, the expansion population created under the Affordable Care Act receives a higher federal match rate than other groups).
The briefing also covered Vermont’s governance and regulatory landscape for health care. Nolan summarized the role of the Green Mountain Care Board (created under Act 48 in 2011) in rate review for hospitals and health insurers, data collection and signatory responsibilities for all-payer models. He said the board is a five-member body with staff that does rate review, oversees certificates of need and supports policy work tied to the state’s health-care transformation efforts.
Committee members discussed follow-up work. The presenter and the chair agreed to invite Agency of Human Services staff, and Nolan or others will return to the committee for further detail on eligibility categories, the global commitment waiver and how changes might affect the state budget. The committee chair noted that health and welfare decisions have fiscal consequences and that the committee works closely with Finance and Appropriations committees on policy that affects the budget.
Before adjourning the public portion of the meeting, committee leadership moved and seconded a nomination to appoint Senator Samuel Douglas as clerk. The committee approved the nomination by voice vote; a roll call was taken but the transcript did not record a numerical tally.
The committee scheduled additional review and deeper briefings on Medicaid and health-insurance topics in forthcoming meetings, and members were directed to the meeting materials posted on the committee’s web page for Nolan’s slides and supporting data.

