Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fargo planning commission approves Metro Flood Diversion maintenance site rezoning, OKs several plats; neighbors voice parking concerns near NDSU
Summary
On Jan. 7 the Fargo Planning Commission approved a zone change and subdivision plat for a Metro Flood Diversion Authority maintenance site and signed off on several minor and major plats. Neighbors near NDSU raised parking and density concerns about a separate replat that would allow high-density housing.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
FARGO, N.D. — The Fargo Planning Commission on Jan. 7 approved a zone change and subdivision plat for a Metro Flood Diversion Authority maintenance facility and moved forward on multiple minor and major plats across the city, while residents near North Dakota State University pressed the commission for details about parking and future building size.
Commissioners voted to change zoning on a parcel associated with the Metro Flood Diversion project to PI, public and institutional, and to approve the AAB (AAV) addition subdivision plat that establishes a single lot for a future maintenance and operations building. Donald Kress, planner with the Department of Planning and Development, told commissioners a title-review issue about a 33-foot right-of-way dedication for 45th Street had been resolved before the hearing and staff removed that contingency from its recommendation.
Paul Barthel, a consultant for the Metro Flood Diversion Authority, said the site was acquired to support the southern embankment and will host a small office, control room and maintenance shop. "It will be directly connected and directly adjacent" to diversion infrastructure, Barthel said, adding the building pad was elevated as part of the Army Corps project and the driveway will tie into future 45th Street at grade.
Why it matters: The approval clears a procedural land-entitlement step that authorizes a public/institutional use on the site and establishes lot lines and required right-of-way dedications ahead of future building permits. Kress emphasized the action before the commission was a zone change and subdivision plat, not approval of final building plans.
Nearby, on a separate item the commission approved a replat that combines seven lots near 12th Avenue North and 18th Street into a single larger parcel (the Skyline addition), leaving the property’s UMU (University Mixed Use) zoning intact. That replat drew public comment from a neighborhood resident who said she and others were worried about parking, traffic and scale if a high-density building is proposed.
Sarah Nelson, speaking during public comment, asked, "How big is this place gonna be? How many units?" and said neighbors were concerned about street parking: "We're concerned about the parking situation. ... We have a hard time now parking on the street the way it is." Planner Donald Kress responded that any future building must meet the land development code's on-site parking requirements and that any street reconstruction would follow the city's infrastructure funding policy.
Nate Vollmuth, representing the property owner, said the commission’s decision that day only concerned the subdivision. "We're just deciding on a subdivision here this afternoon," Vollmuth said. He added the owner expects a high-density residential project in the future but that additional entitlements, permits and any public-notice steps would come later. Kress also reminded the commission and audience that UMU requires a minimum density; "the minimum density is 18 dwelling units per acre," he said.
A conditional use permit request for light industrial uses at 136 16th Street North (Craig's 16th Street addition) drew discussion about the neighborhood context. Brad Garcia, representing the property owner, said the intent is light, indoor industrial use such as a roofing company operating out of small shop units; he described the area as transitional and urged clearer guidance in the city’s forthcoming land development code rewrite. Staff recommended approval with typical conditions to protect surrounding residential areas; the commission approved the request.
Several other minor subdivisions and plats were approved with little or no public comment, including Eagle Ridge Plaza addition (a minor replat into five lots), Cottonwood Corner addition (replatting industrial lots), and a zone change on a separate Beardsley lot from SR3 (single-dwelling) to UMU at the request of a new owner.
Votes at a glance - AAB/AAV addition (Metro Flood Diversion) — zone change to PI and approval of subdivision plat. Motion to approve carried (roll call: ayes; contingency about 45th Street dedication removed before vote). - Skyline addition (lots 16–22, Block 3) — replat combining seven lots into one; UMU zoning unchanged. Motion to accept staff findings and approve plat carried. Public comment raised parking and density concerns; staff said on-site parking is required by code and that there is no change to zoning in this action. - Eagle Ridge Plaza addition — minor subdivision to replat one lot into five lots; approved. - Cottonwood Corner addition — minor industrial replat; approved. - Craig's 16th Street (CUP for light industrial in GC) — conditional use permit approved with conditions; staff noted limits that apply when industrial use is within 300 feet of residential zones. - Beardsley (single lot SR3 to UMU zone change) — approved as requested by property owner.
What the commission and staff said: Staff consistently framed these items as land-entitlement steps — plats and zone changes that establish lot lines and permitted uses but do not approve building designs. Kress and other staff repeatedly told the public that site-specific development standards (setbacks, parking, building permits, utility disconnections) would be reviewed under later permit processes and that some neighborhood notice occurs for larger site-plan or conditional-use applications but not for simple plats.
What’s next: The approved plats and zone change establish the legal framework for future permits. Developers who propose buildings on these lots will still need to submit site plans or building permits, comply with UMU or PI standards, meet parking and setback requirements, and — when required — follow additional public-notice and review processes.

