Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Urban Agriculture topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cass Clay Food Commission adopts urban agriculture framework; chair highlights equity focus
Summary
The Cass Clay Food Commission voted to adopt a new Urban Agricultural Framework presented by Anna Johnson. Commissioners said the document will guide the commission’s review of existing “blueprints” and support future policy updates. The motion passed in a roll-call vote with one abstention.
Get email alerts on the Urban Agriculture topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Cass Clay Food Commission on Jan. 10 approved an Urban Agricultural Framework presented by Anna Johnson, an at‑large member and graduate student in nutrition. The commission adopted the framework to inform future work on zoning, blueprints and policy documents that relate to urban agriculture across the metro area.
The framework will be used by the commission and the Cass Clay Food Partners to put urban agriculture topics on a consistent knowledge base, evaluate existing policy blueprints and identify gaps that need updating, Anna Johnson said. “Equity is a big focus of the framework document,” Johnson said, adding the paper aims to present benefits and challenges so resources are allocated appropriately.
Commissioners described the framework as a launching point for more detailed blueprints and for engaging community members and external partners in future document updates. Chair Heather Niesemeyer said the framework ties into the commission’s recently adopted strategic plan and will help prioritize which blueprints to update in 2025.
A roll-call vote followed the presentation. Commissioner Kremenoff moved approval; the motion was seconded and discussion then closed. The motion passed with commissioners recorded as voting in favor and one abstention. The commission directed staff and partners to use the framework when prioritizing blueprint updates and onboarding work groups tied to the strategic plan.
Commissioners and staff noted the framework’s audience is primarily food‑partner members and steering‑committee members rather than municipal code writers, and said subsequent work would translate the framework into more policy‑oriented blueprints when needed.
What’s next: Commissioners expect the framework to be used to guide short‑term work groups (on bylaws, onboarding and document updates) and to set an annual cadence for reviewing existing policy blueprints and snapshots.

