Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Marina Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board denies Riverfront PDMU rezone after debate over height, marina and compatibility
Summary
After extensive public comment and a lengthy board debate about density, building height and a proposed marina, the board voted unanimously to deny the Riverfront PDMU application.
The Manatee County Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously on Jan. 14 to deny a proposed plan-development mixed-use (PDMU) zoning and general development plan for a mixed-use Riverfront project on U.S. 301 roughly one-half mile east of I-75.
The project proposed up to 250 residential units, an 80-slip marina and 55,041 square feet of nonresidential uses in a plan that consolidated three parcels and asked for specific approvals related to tree-preservation rules and fence requirements adjacent to a canal. Applicant representatives revised earlier, larger proposals and reduced nonresidential square footage from a previously cited 143,000 square feet to 55,041 square feet before the hearing.
Supporters argued the site is an appropriate infill location near State Road 70/I-75 infrastructure and utilities. Staff said the general development plan lacked sufficient detail for thorough review of building placement, parking, internal circulation and the marina. Staff also raised concerns that portions of the site lie within coastal overlays (including the Coastal High Hazard Area) where allowable densities can be lower, and cited potential traffic and coastal-environment impacts that require further detail.
Public speakers including nearby homeowners and an HOA lawyer urged denial or additional safeguards, citing private-road access, seawall condition, canal navigability and potential impacts of an 80‑slip marina on seagrass and manatees. Environmental and permitting experts for the applicant said marina details and any impacts to manatees or seagrass would be addressed during state and federal permitting (DEP, SWFWMD, Army Corps, FWC and USFWS) if the board allowed the project to proceed.
After extended discussion, a motion to deny the general development plan passed; the motion was made by Commissioner Ballard and seconded by Commissioner McCann. The board recorded a unanimous vote to deny (7–0).
Why it matters: The denial stops a high-density mixed-use project on a riverfront parcel adjacent to established residential neighborhoods. The vote reflects concern among commissioners, staff and neighbors about building height, marina impacts, traffic and insufficient project-level detail for compatibility review.
Next steps: The denial ends the current application; applicants may revise and resubmit if they choose. Any marina proposal would still require state and federal permits, and staff noted that those environmental reviews would be required before any waterward construction could occur.
