Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Book Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses public reading, book challenges and Florida Statute 1006.28 during meeting
Summary
Members discussed the district’s book-challenge process after recent public readings at meetings and cited Florida Statute 1006.28, which the chair said can trigger automatic removal if a chair interrupts a reading; board members debated clearer parent communication and procedural improvements.
Get email alerts on the Book Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members of the Orange County School Board used time during the Jan. 14 meeting to revisit policies and procedures for public book challenges after prior incidents in which members of the public read from challenged books during meetings.
Chair Terry Jacobs described the legislative background and the district’s constrained options when a public reading occurs. “The legislature in the 1006.28 stipulated that for any book that's part of a book challenge, if a parent or any, resident comes up to start reading out of the book, if the chair of the, of the board stops the reading of the book, the book would have to automatically be removed from the shelf,” Jacobs said, explaining why the board has allowed some public readings at meetings.
Board members said the current process can be confusing for parents and suggested clarifying routes for raising concerns with school media specialists and school-level review committees. Member Douglas asked for clearer and more concise communication to parents about how to raise concerns and how the committee review process works. Member Salamanca and others urged the board to avoid spending disproportionate staff time on a small number of complaints while also ensuring parents understand materials available to their children.
District staff said a formal challenge process exists that includes school-level committees with parent representation; staff agreed to bring more information on policy and practice back to the board for review. Discussion participants also noted the board’s pre-agenda conversations are not recorded or broadcast, which complicates public understanding of how leaders addressed prior incidents.
Ending
Board members asked for clearer documentation of the book-challenge process and for staff to return with a presentation of current practice, including how parents submit challenges and how school committees review materials.

