Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Nonprofit Funding Process topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Budget subcommittee to set nonprofit funding priorities; departments urged to include requests before Feb. 7 deadline

2112292 · January 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee agreed to form a subcommittee to define Metro priorities for nonprofit funding, improve web guidance for applicants and push departments to include nonprofit-related budget requests before the mayor's Feb. 7 submission deadline. A special budget meeting and a Feb. 5 follow-up were scheduled.

A Budget & Finance committee meeting of a Metro nonprofit advisory group on Jan. 14 focused on creating an orderly, earlier process for directing Metro funding to nonprofits and closing gaps that leave organizations without contracts for months.

The group agreed to form a short-term subcommittee that will include an administration representative, the budget chair and vice chair, finance staff and subject departments to set the year's nonprofit priorities and recommend how Metro should route grant opportunities. Chair Porterfield said the goal was to avoid last-minute council appropriations and improve clarity for nonprofits: "Budgets always involve hard choices," Porterfield said.

Why it matters: nonprofit leaders attending said late or improvised appropriations have left some organizations unable to operate while contracts and audits were completed. The meeting produced concrete near-term steps intended to reduce that disruption during the current budget season.

Most important decisions and next steps

- Subcommittee: The group agreed to convene a subcommittee to identify Metro's priorities for the coming year, focusing on areas where nonprofits supplement municipal services (examples discussed included housing, childcare, food access and transit). The subcommittee makeup discussed: an administration representative, the budget chair and vice chair, finance staff and relevant department representatives.

- Timeline and meetings: The committee scheduled a follow-up meeting for Feb. 5 at 1 p.m. to review subcommittee progress and a special budget meeting to brief the full council. Meeting participants emphasized that departments should include nonprofit-related requests in their submissions to the mayor; the group noted that Metro's formal deadline for department budget submissions into the mayor's system is Feb. 7.

- Website and communications: Jane, a finance division staff member, was asked to revise the finance-page landing content and produce a simple step-by-step guide linking the Metro grants manual and the hub so nonprofits can find where to apply and how proposals are routed. Jane agreed to attempt a demo of the revised landing page at the next meeting.

- Selection approach: Participants discussed two prevailing paths: (1) department-managed RFPs and the Community Partners/Community Benefits Fund model, where departments receive allocations and run competitions; and (2) direct appropriations, where the mayor or council names an organization in the budget. The group stressed that direct appropriations work only if the named recipient meets contract prequalification (audits, reporting) before budget adoption; otherwise, departments must run a qualification or RFP process.

What participants said and key concerns

Nonprofit representatives attending said the late timing this year forced some groups to operate without active contracts, creating financial strain. One attendee said several organizations remain "not under contract" from prior cycles and urged the committee to design a forward-looking solution rather than a short-term patch.

Council member Howard suggested using Council Connect to solicit councilmembers' ranked priorities so the subcommittee can compare geographic and policy preferences before the budget is finalized.

Implementation details and clarifications from the meeting

- Program names referenced in discussion included the Metro grants manual, the Community Partners/Community Benefits Fund (CPF), and the National Needs Fund (the latter noted as allowing non-nonprofit applicants such as professional women's sports organizations).

- Departments are the practical owners of grant administration; for continuity, nonprofits should work with the department that would oversee a grant to request continuation in the upcoming mayoral budget.

- If an item is not specified as a direct appropriation with a named organization in the mayor's budget, a transparent RFP or qualification process is required to allocate funds fairly.

Ending

The committee tasked volunteers to convene the subcommittee and prepare communications to the council and nonprofits, and asked that nonprofit representatives contact departments early so funding requests can be included in the Feb. 7 mayoral submission. The group will review progress at the Feb. 5 meeting and reconvene in early February to assess whether the steps have moved forward as planned.