Tim Eyman testified in opposition to a proposed road‑usage charge (described in testimony as a “pay‑per‑mile” or “mileage tax”) during the public hearing on SB 5161. He told the committee that such a measure would provoke widespread voter opposition, comparing it unfavorably to other vehicle‑related fees such as vehicle tabs.

Eyman argued voters have endured multiple tax increases across recent sessions and that labeling a road‑usage charge as an alternative to the gas tax risks being a “bait and switch” if it is layered on top of existing taxes. Senator Fortunato interjected later to note that the proposal discussed is technically termed a road‑usage charge by proponents and not a mileage tax; Eyman and Fortunato exchanged remarks about terminology and public perception.

Eyman’s remarks were entered into the hearing record; no committee action on road‑usage charges occurred during the session.