Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Pensions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate hears proposal to restore 7.5% state contribution to public employee pensions; municipal leaders say it would lower property‑tax burden
Summary
Senate Bill 20 would have the state pay 7.5% of employer pension costs for public employees. Municipal officials and the New Hampshire Municipal Association testified in favor, saying the change would relieve property taxpayers and stem long‑term fiscal pressure created after the state cut contributions in 2011.
Senate Bill 20, introduced by Sen. Sydney Rosenwald, would direct the state to pay 7.5% of the employer cost for public‑employee pensions. Rosenwald told the Senate Finance Committee the measure is intended to provide property‑tax relief: "A lower bill for the employer's cost of the pension does mean lower burden on property taxes," she said, adding that a one‑time 7.5% payment had been made previously and that restoring an ongoing contribution would help homeowners.
The hearing featured testimony from municipal officials and associations seeking relief from pension‑related property‑tax pressures. Jim Donchess, mayor of Nashua, told senators a large share of municipal pension payments has been going to recapitalize the system after prior funding shortfalls: "If you talk with the people from the pension system, they will tell you ... that 75% of the contributions made by cities and towns doesn't even relate to the current employees," Donchess said. He and other municipal witnesses said taxing districts have borne a growing share of pension costs since the state eliminated prior contributions around 2011, contributing to higher local tax bills.
Local officials provided city‑level estimates. Rosenwald said the state's decision to stop contributing cost Nashua about $10 million annually and roughly $100 million cumulatively since 2012. Dave Karlen, town administrator in Derry, told the committee the town estimates a $2.8 million impact this year and $14.4 million cumulatively since 2010. Margaret Burns of the New Hampshire Municipal Association urged committee support, saying restoration of some state retirement contribution has been a long‑standing municipal priority.
Senators asked whether a state contribution could lead municipalities to increase wages; witnesses said local budget controls, tax caps and personnel constraints limit that risk and that the bulk of current payments are addressing unfunded liabilities rather than current payroll. No committee vote was taken at the hearing; senators said they will continue consideration during budget deliberations.
