Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Planning Commission approves subdivisions, rezones and variances; several items deferred
Summary
A summarized list of motions and outcomes from the Planning Commission meeting, including subdivision approvals, rezoning recommendations, variances granted and a deferred commercial site-plan review. Final approvals for rezones go to the County Commission.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its meeting the Loudon County Planning Commission voted on multiple subdivision plans, rezoning requests, variances and administrative reviews. Below are the actions recorded in the meeting transcript and their outcomes as reported by the commission's voice votes. Where roll-call tallies were not recorded in the transcript, outcomes are noted as carried by voice vote.
Votes at a glance
- Annual meeting: Election of Planning Commission officers — motion to keep officers the same as last year. Outcome: approved by voice vote.
- Subdivision reviews and approvals • 3-lot subdivision (Myron Mullins, 75100 White Queen Road) — applicant requested to move to February meeting; item postponed (no formal vote required). • 3-lot subdivision (Chris Rosser / Sterling Engineering, Allen Shore Drive) — final approval granted; motion carried by voice vote. • 5-lot final plat (Geisvert Family Holdings, Sun Hill Drive; representative Deborah Rossi) — final approval granted; motion carried by voice vote (one commissioner recused from related item as noted). • 4-lot subdivision (Deborah Rossi, Sun Hill Drive; separate parcel) — final approval granted; motion carried by voice vote.
- Commercial site plan (Roger Boring, Parkwater Road) — discussion held; commission voted to defer the item to the February meeting.
- Rezoning requests • A-2 to A-3 (Doyle Chadwell, 930 Corinth Church Road) — applicant presented intent to split and sell; commission approved rezoning recommendation by voice vote. • A-1 to A-3 (Steven Simmons / Jonathan Mendoza, 5805 Uniti Road) — no contact received; motion to table — item tabled. • A-2/F-1 to A-3/F-1 (Thomas County/Abbotom property, 22606 Beals Chapel Road; applicant Kirkpatrick) — rezoning to protect a historic house discussed and recommended by commission; motion carried by voice vote. • C-2 to R-1 (Hamilton property, Raymond Cooper, Chohannaway Avenue) — rezoning approved by voice vote to permit residential use; item noted that the site is in the City of Greenback review area. • A-1 to R-2 (Turner Homes, Lehi Ranch LLC, 700 Fransel Road) — Planning Commission recommended rezoning to R-2 and forwarded recommendation to County Commission; developer to return for cluster-option special exception and preliminary plat (detailed article above). • A-2 to CFD (Roman Catholic Diocese donation, North Shore Drive, 10.9 acres) — rezoning recommended to allow cemetery; forwarded to County Commission for final action (detailed article above).
- Variances and administrative reviews • Variance: 10-foot front-yard setback for porch on new mobile home (William Badgett, 600 Caldwell Road) — variance approved by voice vote. • Variance: 10-foot front-yard setback for replacement mobile home (Clayton Homes representative, 3660 Williamsburg Road) — variance approved by voice vote; applicant cited rock, topography and an existing side-built garage as hardship factors. • Administrative review: Letter of violation (Tracy Winters, 1866 Prospect Church Road) — administrative review heard in applicant’s absence; commission voted to uphold the regulation/enforcement as presented by staff.
What happens next
Most rezoning recommendations will be forwarded to the County Commission for final action. Items deferred to February must return on that agenda. Applications requiring special exceptions, preliminary plats or site-plan approvals will return to the Planning Commission for technical review and to ensure required road improvements and conditions are addressed.
Where the transcript recorded only voice votes saying “aye,” the meeting record shows motions carried; specific named tallies were not recorded in the transcript.

