Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council discusses funding and logistics for 10 new downtown surveillance cameras; first‑year cost estimated at about $117,000
Summary
Police and city staff told council installing 10 additional downtown surveillance cameras would cost roughly $117,000 the first year (installation plus first‑year maintenance) and about $62,000 annually thereafter; councilors asked staff to work with the CFO on budget options and explored partnering with property owners for siting.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Councilors on Jan. 14 discussed a proposal to add roughly 10 surveillance cameras in downtown Lowell to assist investigations and public safety operations. The police chief and staff briefed the council on costs, grant history and building‑access issues.
Police representatives said a vendor estimate put first‑year costs — installation plus the first year of maintenance — at approximately $117,000, with an annual maintenance fee thereafter of roughly $62,000. The department previously secured grant funding for some cameras but said some earlier grants were one‑year awards that do not cover ongoing maintenance.
Councilor Noon asked whether state and federal grants could fund the cameras; the chief said the administration will consult the CFO and consider budget options. Staff noted that some downtown cameras are on privately owned buildings and the city must negotiate access with property owners for new camera locations. Speakers said existing cameras at targeted locations such as around Jay’s Food Store and Summit Street have been useful to investigations and encouraged expanding coverage in trouble spots.
Councilors and staff also discussed potential for mobile camera units and for combining camera installation with improved lighting in key locations. One councilor suggested property‑owner partnerships and solar‑powered lighting as partial solutions to costs.
Why it matters: Additional cameras and lighting could help police investigations and public safety in downtown activity areas; costs and property access are practical hurdles.
Next steps: The police department will continue discussions with the CFO about funding, explore grant opportunities and report back to council with a financing recommendation and suggested locations.

