Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mental Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears update on contested selection for county mental health clinic; state review pending
Summary
The council heard that another provider has contested the county’s selection of Jane Pauley as the mental-health clinic provider, and officials said the state must resolve the contest before services can be transferred or clinic space reassigned.
Council members reported a contested selection process for the county mental health clinic and said the contest is delaying implementation.
During council reports Mary (council member) and commissioners said another mental health provider filed a formal contest over the county’s apparent selection of Jane Pauley as the local provider. Council members and school officials expressed concerns about the contesting provider’s performance in the community. County officials said they had submitted letters of support for Jane Pauley and expect the state to consider those materials.
The council was told that state rules allow other providers to file interest and that the Division of Mental Health and Addiction (DMHA) will evaluate competing applicants; contestation does not automatically prevent selection, but it requires the state to review competing proposals before transferring responsibility. Council members said the competing provider may withdraw after seeing the county’s progress, but as of the Jan. 14 meeting DMHA review and the contest remain outstanding and must be resolved before the county can proceed with site planning or provider transition.
Council members said they are continuing outreach to encourage the contesting provider to withdraw, and noted that even a prompt selection would take many months to implement if it requires building or relocating clinic facilities.
No formal council vote or directive was recorded; the item was reported as ongoing in council reports.
