Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CFISD presents formative-assessment gains, board presses for deeper study of long-term English learners
Summary
At a Jan. 13 work session, Cypress‑Fairbanks ISD officials reported districtwide formative‑assessment progress tied to Strategic Plan Goal 1 while trustees pressed for more analysis of persistent gaps for English learners and students with disabilities.
CYPRESS‑FAIRBANKS ISD — The Cypress‑Fairbanks Independent School District presented districtwide formative‑assessment results linked to Strategic Plan Goal 1 during the board of trustees work session on Monday, Jan. 13.
Chief Academic Officer Doctor Goree told trustees the district uses formative assessments “with the purpose of monitoring student learning, providing feedback to enhance teaching and learning, identify gaps, and tailor instruction.” The district shared multi‑year targets that aim to raise “approaches” scores to 90% by 2029, and set annual progress targets of 2% growth at the approaches level and 3% at the meets/masters levels.
The data slides showed disaggregated results by subject and subgroup. For the reading/language arts tables presented for middle grades, the all‑students rows reported percentages at three performance bands; for example, English I (DPM 2) was reported as roughly 93% at approaches or higher, 89% at meets or higher and 43% at the masters level. Similar tables were shown for science (5th/8th grades), U.S. history and other tested courses.
Why it matters: trustees said the headline numbers show progress but emphasized that aggregate percentages can mask persistent subgroup gaps. Board member Natalie praised the presentation and singled out U.S. history as an area where subgroup gaps had narrowed: “On US history, that's the one subject where we don't see a gap between African American, Hispanic, and white and Asian students,” she said. Several trustees asked staff for deeper analysis of long‑term English learners and students in special education who remain below grade expectations.
Goree described district strategies to close gaps, saying the district will continue “providing professional development focused on delivering high quality first time instruction,” use video coaching to refine practice, reinforce foundational skills through strategic spiraling and “continue the consistent use of progress monitoring to assess student growth, identify areas of need, and adjust instructional strategies accordingly.”
Trustees asked technical and programmatic questions. One board member asked how tested cohorts were defined; Goree explained counts reflect enrollment in the courses (for example, English I and U.S. History counts depend on course enrollment; 5th grade science totals include all 5th graders but 8th grade science totals reflect students enrolled in that course). Several trustees asked staff to disaggregate longitudinal data to identify whether some English learners had long‑term gaps tied to earlier native‑language supports or to program placement decisions.
The district said it will continue progress monitoring and invited trustees to request specific follow‑up analyses. The presentation concluded with an offer by staff to provide deeper subgroup trend reports and longitudinal cohort analyses at future meetings.
