Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Development Economy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Addison Farms developers, village staff continue negotiations after redline of development agreement; council approves further discussions

2111319 · January 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council and developer representatives reviewed a redline development-agreement draft for Addison Farms and directed village counsel to continue negotiations addressing TIF, reimbursable soft costs and assignment language.

Village staff and developers discussed a redline draft of the Addison Farms development agreement and related documents; council authorized staff to continue negotiations and asked for additional language and budgeting details to be included in the next draft.

Bill (village solicitor), the mayor and council reviewed a redline circulated the morning of the meeting. The redline removed an NCA provision, eliminated proposed eminent domain language (addressing a council concern), and preserved certain TIP-funded off-site improvement language the mayor and council favored. The redline showed on-site improvements of approximately $19,400,000 (exhibit B figures) and off-site TIP-eligible improvements of just over $2,000,000; council members and developers noted those figures are estimates in the redline.

Developers’ counsel and representatives asked that customary soft costs — engineering, inspection and plan-review fees — be included among reimbursable TIF-eligible costs. Developers also discussed TIF/bond mechanics and said a typical TIF-based bond would include minimum service payments (a common component of service-payment bonds) that they expect to see reflected in future legislation. Representatives explained the property is currently under contract by a party named in the draft (GFSJAF Acquisitions) and that, in practice, assignment to a single-purpose entity is customary before closing; counsel asked the agreement permit assignment to that entity.

Council indicated staff should continue negotiations with the developer and return with a blue-line draft that incorporates the agreed edits and addresses the developers' requests to include soft costs and typical TIF bond language. Developers said they expect to produce a rewritten draft for village counsel within several days and anticipated returning to the council next month with updated documents. No vote to approve the agreement took place at this meeting; council authorized continued negotiation and directed staff to report progress at the next Committee-of-the-Whole meeting.