Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

IT staff recommend new wide‑area network contract after vendor bids show savings

January 13, 2025 | WINCHESTER CITY PBLC SCHS, School Districts, Virginia


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

IT staff recommend new wide‑area network contract after vendor bids show savings
Brad McBride (IT staff) briefed the board on a request for proposals for the district’s wide‑area network (WAN) — the fiber links that connect the central office to school buildings. He said the district’s existing WAN contract (from 2014) expires at the end of June and the RFP returned three bids with a range of pricing and link‑speeds.

McBride said the district currently uses 10‑gig links and that the lowest bidder proposed 10‑gig service at approximately $750 per link per month (the RFP sheet summarized multiple speed tiers and monthly link pricing). He noted that the lowest bidder also is the district’s internet service provider; that relationship likely explains why that proposal omitted an extra “head‑end” charge other vendors included. McBride estimated the new contract would lower current monthly costs (about $8,900 today) by roughly $2,400–$3,500 per month depending on vendor and configuration, producing substantial savings over a five‑ to ten‑year contract.

McBride recommended accepting the lowest‑cost 10‑gig option with the caveat that being both WAN vendor and internet provider creates some dependency; he said the risk of simultaneous outage is low and that all vendors must meet uptime and response SLAs in the contract. He described implementation as a summer project to avoid classroom disruption and said the new provider would install parallel services before cutover to minimize downtime.

Staff framed the procurement as a threshold item that exceeds the division director’s procurement authority because the multi‑year cost crosses the district’s board approval threshold (about $300,000 over five years); McBride asked the board to note the recommendation so staff can proceed with contract award consistent with procurement rules.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Virginia articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI