Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parking topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

ULCT asks members about proposed statewide parking stall and tandem-count standards

2110922 · January 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senators and industry stakeholders have proposed statewide off-street parking stall dimensions and a mandate that tandem spaces count as two stalls. ULCT surveyed members for priority and enforcement concerns and recommended coordinated city feedback.

Senator Fillmore has signaled plans to propose a legislative standard for off-street residential parking stall dimensions (covered 10-by-20 feet; uncovered 9-by-18 feet) and to treat tandem parking (one car parked behind another) as two off-street stalls.

ULCT staff told the committee this proposal has strong support from some industry stakeholders and the Home Builders Coalition; league staff said many municipalities oppose top-down design standards and noted most of the 40 city ordinances the league sampled use similar but not identical stall dimensions. Staff asked members to indicate how high a priority it would be for their city to oppose a statewide parking-stall-size mandate and whether counting tandem as two stalls would be acceptable locally.

Why it matters: Parking stall size and tandem-counting affect neighborhood spillover, curb access, and enforcement. Cities also raised enforcement concerns: if tandem counts as two stalls for development approvals, on-street spillover and enforcement capacity may increase.

Member feedback and next steps: The league will collect detailed survey responses and, if members indicate high priority and readiness to push back, will coordinate a more active lobbying posture with the ULCT board and officers. Staff also said they are exploring whether strengthened local code-enforcement tools could be paired with any statutory changes to limit spillover effects.

Ending: Members were asked to complete a Slido survey and a follow-up questionnaire so league staff can develop consistent legislative talking points and, if needed, escalate opposition.